Apr 182013
 

Do you ever feel like you’ve just jumped into an alternate reality that’s just slightly different to where you came from? No? Just me?

Well I love science videos. My whole family does in fact. So we watch a lot of them and range fairly widely. And I write a blog on things geeky in Australia and spend a lot of time wandering around the antipodean parts of the Web. So how on Earth did I not come across Veritasium until yesterday? In my defense it could be that I had seen it and was misled by Derek Muller’s accent into thinking it wasn’t Australian, but that’s not much of a defense because it’s a brilliant science series regardless of its provenance.

Good science, quirky subjects, abounding enthusiasm, and scientists with Australian accents – what more could I ask for? Oh, and there’s a levitating barbecue; maybe I am in an alternate reality after all. If so, it’s a fine place to be.

Check out the Veritasium YouTube channel in all its glory here.

Apr 162013
 

What do science museums and Wiggles concerts have in common? You’re only going to see adults there if accompanied by a child – and in one case that’s a shame.

I visited Scienceworks in Melbourne over the weekend and was pleasantly surprised to see how many of the parents there were attracted to, and spending time on, the exhibits. Seeing adults engage with the exhibits was pleasing and thought-provoking. Now it goes without saying that the only adults there had kids with them; but, that’s not surprise, because in many science museums the exhibits function solely as a playground for the kids and the parents spend their time sitting in corners huddled over their iPhones. And that’s a shame.

It’s a shame because it presupposes that adults have nothing to learn in a science museum. Given the state of most people’s science education, that s a big leap. Most of us can learn a lot from a science museum, even if it’s only to crystallise dimly remembered forced science lessons.

It’s a shame because the best way for a child to actually learn something is to have an engaged adult help explain it. Museums can’t afford to have a demonstrator stationed at every exhibit, sadly, so the next best thing is for a child to bring their own.

It’s a shame because the best way to show a child that science is fun and interesting and engaging and useful is not to make it into a playground. It’s to have their parent demonstrate those things, to model the interest we hope for from our kids.

I’m not saying that the demonstrations should not be fun – we all like fun – but they also need to be educational and engaging at a level beyond an six-year-old. And that was the other noticeable thing at the science museum on the weekend – how few teenagers were there with their parents. If you pitch the exhibits at a pre-school or primary school level you not only lose a major part of what should be your audience, you lose a really important audience. Capturing the attention of teenagers who are at the point of beginning to focus their educational choices ought to be a major goal of any institution dedicated to science.

Making a science museum that works for older children, young adults and adults is important. It’s harder to do because the exhibits need to function as more than a playground, but the pay-off when it’s done well is very real. Science  museums should not just be for kids – they should be for every engaged member of the community.

Apr 142013
 

Science-Or-MagicYou know what I hate? I hate it when a ‘science’ show for kids turns out to be a series of magic tricks.

The purpose of science is to explain the world. In the early days of human consciousness we tried to explain the world through religion and magic. Our need for explanation and order was temporarily satisfied by higher beings and magical occurrences that required belief beyond evidence.

As time has gone by we stumbled upon the scientific method. Come up with a hypothesis, test that hypothesis with experiments and determine its accuracy by seeing if the facts fit. This is the antithesis of religion and magic – it’s all about understanding how the world works in reality, divorced from blind belief. That’s not to say science is always correct, but that’s part of the process. And that process of questioning, or not accepting without understanding, is itself part of what makes science work.

So when you have a science show at a well-respected science museum, Scienceworks in this case, that does a pile of tricks without explaining the science behind them, that is NOT SCIENCE. It’s not demonstrating the wonder of science, it’s not creating new scientists, it’s not achieving anything consistent with its goals.

Now I know the kids have fun seeing things go bang and someone putting a skewer through a balloon without it popping. But they can do that at any magic show, at a birthday party. If you’re putting on a science show you need to use the tricks to explain the world to show that it’s not happening because of magic or gods; that it is happening because we humans understand how our world works – or some of it anyway. And, done right, that can be as wonderful and awe-inspiring as any magic trick.

Mar 132013
 

How many of these scientists can you recognise? There are subtle clues in each drawing – some of which were too subtle for me, so I learnt about a couple of new scientists today.

This beautiful picture was produced by the very talented Chay Hawes. The answers, if you give up, can be found here. (The pictures can also be added individually to t-shirts, iPhone covers and so on which would, of course, provide the very deserving Mr Hawes with some return for his inspiration.)

16_Scientists_Quiz_FULL_ChaygroundDOTcom

Mar 042013
 

cropped-blogs_universe_banner

You can’t claim that CSIRO isn’t ambitious with their new blog whose title rather unassumingly claims to cover, well, everything.

The Universe @ CSIRO is engagingly written and covers things from a nice Australian angle you don’t see elsewhere. Recent articles have included repairs to the Canberra Deep Space Station and the Parkes radio telescope watching galaxies collide. In addition, there’s more general happenings in the world of astronomy. I must say I particularly like the fact that there aren’t a flood of articles – just enough to take a look at a few times a week.

Universe @ CSIRO probably doesn’t quite live up to its aspirational name; but it’s an interesting view on astronomy from an Australia perspective and certainly worth subscribing to.

Feb 122013
 

2013WinnersI vacillate between despair and hope for science and engineering education in Australia. Sometimes as a country it seems we’re only capable of really appreciating sporting achievement. But then I see something like the Science and Engineering Awards 2013 and read about the research carried out by the student winners.

The winner of the Investigations section’s topic was titled The effect of anti-apoptotic genes on immune mediated cell death in cancer cells, second place was An investigation into the use of diatomite for oil retrieval at sea and the third place was a fascinating study on whether people learn better if they hand-write instead of type their notes.

The Engineering section winners did just as well. They created a monitoring device for baby car seats and a better way of delivering medicine, and looked at ways quadriplegics can control wheelchairs.

These are simply amazing topics for high school students and they, and everyone else involved, deserve the heartiest congratulations and a great deal more publicity than they’ve received.

Image: 2013 student winners © Copyright CSIRO Australia 2013.

Feb 042013
 

eureka prizesEntries are now open for the 2013 Eureka Prizes. Entries must be in by 7pm on 3 May.

Presented annually by the Australian Museum, the Eureka Prizes reward excellence in the fields of scientific research & innovation, science leadership, school science and science journalism & communication. They also have the Sleek Geeks section for primary and secondary students to enter.

Full details are on the Eureka Prizes website.